- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:39:36 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Updated test suite accordingly, including test 0214 which specifically checks for this. Gregg On Mar 26, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > We have consensus, the following RDFa WG members have supported the > remaining resolutions necessary to take us into a 2nd Last Call period > for RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1: > > Ivan Herman, Shane McCarron, Toby Inkster, Benjamin Adrian, Knud Möller, > Nathan Rixham, Manu Sporny > > That is 7 positive motions, zero negative motions. > > RESOLVED: The RDFa Core processing rules should be modified in a way > that ensures that the root element assumes an about="" if no @about is > specified. For example, the following text could accomplish this: > > RESOLVED: The decision to assume an empty @about="" on root elements > overrides the decision made on March 24th 2010: > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-03-24#resolution_2 > > RESOLVED: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 should be modified to include > the empty @about="" on root elements decision and should then proceed > into the 2nd Last Call with a publication date targeted at March 31st > with a Last Call period of 3 weeks from the publication date. (with the > clarification that the XHTML+RDFa 1.1 document does not need any changes > made to the text with regards to the about="" issue) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Payment Standards and Competition > http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/02/28/payment-standards/ > >
Received on Saturday, 26 March 2011 22:40:46 UTC