W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Draft updated

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 09:52:31 +0100
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C7950CA7-13B6-4ECF-B3DC-37E2BA947D25@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

On Mar 6, 2011, at 02:15 , Shane McCarron wrote:

>> 8. This is a comment on the XHTML+RDFa document: the DTD defined for XHTML is
>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd
>> shouldn't that be
>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.dtd
> Hmm... technically, no.  Modularization has a convention for file naming that just increments the last digit.  The name of the file has no necessary relationship to the version of RDFa that we are supporting.  You will also notice, for example, that the metainformation module has a funny digit suffix.
> Having said this, I don't want to be a slave to convention if there is a good reason to change it.  Steven, do you have any concerns with going away from the convention that we established in M12N ?
>> instead?
>> Also: is that already installed? Ie, can we make use of it already in the various files? At some point we may want to ask the validator to accept it...
> It is already installed, works, and the validator works with it as far as I know.

Aha! Well, too bad for the DTD naming, I must say.

I have updated the namespace document for RDFa, as well as the two profiles, to use the new DTD.

For all the other answers: ack:-)


> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 08:50:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:24 UTC