Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1

On Jan 18, 2011, at 16:14 , Shane McCarron wrote:

[snip]
> optional.
> 
>> + IMHO, Section "8.3 Object resolution" would benefit from an overview
>> figure explaining the types of objects (you could reuse the "Diagram of RDF
>> Classes, Attributes, Methods and linkages." [2]).
> 
> We are going to add a diagram (Ivan?)

Yes. You and I will have to work on this, but I am happy to do that.

Ivan

> 
> 
>> Congrats to the editors and the entire WG for this solid work - looking
>> forward to see the REC!
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/#the-rdf-interfaces
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 15:21:35 UTC