- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:14:49 -0600
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
This is a DRAFT reply to Michael on his (editorial) last call comments. If there are no objections, I will send this on as our formal response. On 12/5/2010 12:00 PM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > All, > > I promised Manu feedback on RDFa Core 1.1 LC [1] and you can believe me that > I tried very hard to find major issues but failed (which is not surprising > given the long and hard work on this document ;) > > So, overall the document reads very good and I think it is CR/PR ready. Some > minor comments, though, you might want to consider addressing: > > + Section "6. CURIE Syntax Definition": I think the second paragraph would > benefit from a rewording. The usage of '' and sentences such as "This > specification does not define a default 'no prefix' mapping." are somewhat > hard to digest. Further, the last paragraph: > > [[ > Note that the resulting URI must be a syntactically valid IRI [RFC3987 > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/#bib-RFC3987> ]. For a more > detailed explanation see CURIE and URI Processing > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/#s_curieprocessing> . Also > note that while the lexical space of a CURIE is as defined in curie > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/#P_curie> above, the value > space is the set of IRIs. > ]] > > ... should, IMHO be at the very beginning of this section. I have moved this toward the top of the section - after the introductory paragraph. > + The Section "7.5 Sequence" says: "This specification defines processing > rules for optional attributes that may not be present in all Host Languages > (e.g., @href)." --> I'd love to see a list of optional attribs somewhere in > the document (did I overlook this?) The list of attributes is defined in section 5 (Attributes and Syntax). This section identifies a few attributes as optional. > + IMHO, Section "8.3 Object resolution" would benefit from an overview > figure explaining the types of objects (you could reuse the "Diagram of RDF > Classes, Attributes, Methods and linkages." [2]). We are going to add a diagram (Ivan?) > Congrats to the editors and the entire WG for this solid work - looking > forward to see the REC! > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/#the-rdf-interfaces > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 15:15:19 UTC