- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:15:25 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 16:15:55 UTC
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:41:22 +0100 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > There is a reference to a blog comparing RDFa to microformats which > is hopelessly outdated and, as far as I can judge, was factually > wrong even at the time it was written, etc... In fairness to Evan, whose blog post is referenced, it was written in September 2007, before the first public working draft of XHTML+RDFa 1.0 was published, when the only public W3C documents describing RDFa were the XHTML 2.0 working drafts. Evan is now lead developer of StatusNet, the software that powers identi.ca. While the only RDFa StatusNet publishes is the grandfathered-in rel values and a little OGP here and there, it does publish some pretty good FOAF, SIOC and RSS in RDF/XML. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 16:15:55 UTC