- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:55:13 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:09:12 +0000 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > cool - what about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.2.2 > and > http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml - > aren't the same terms mapped to (or may be mapped to) different IRIs? Atom (which fed into RFC 5988) maps link relations by adding this prefix: http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/ RDFa 1.0 maps many of the same relations to: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# RDFa 1.1 can't really differ from 1.0 - we're chartered to maintain backwards compatibility as much as possible. However, the vocab could use owl:equivalentProperty or rdfs:subPropertyOf to link to the IANA URIs. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 23:55:44 UTC