- From: John O'Donovan <john.odonovan@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:53:42 -0000
- To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "RDFa WG" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Isn't it generally a more prominent warning in a pop up box, such as illustrated here: http://www.sslshopper.com/article-stop-the-page-contains-secure-and-nons ecure-items-warning.html John O'Donovan Chief Technical Architect BBC News and Knowledge, Future Media & Technology BC3 C1, Broadcast Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/ -----Original Message----- From: public-rdfa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdfa-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Manu Sporny Sent: 03 November 2010 20:37 To: RDFa WG Subject: Possible issue w/ @profile and http vs. https Just noting this here as it popped into my head while dealing with some SSL-related browser issues. When a web page and its associated resources are loaded over TLS, the browser will provide a graphical warning (usually in the URL bar website icon) if there are some resources that were loaded over a non-TLS connection into the page. This is usually triggered whenever there are images, or CSS files that were loaded over an HTTP vs. and HTTPS connection. The browsers do this because an image or CSS file might trick the person browsing into doing something that is unsafe. @profile falls into this category, if a @profile is compromised, it may generate the wrong triples in a page. If one is operating on RDF triples via the RDFa API on a page that was loaded via HTTPS, and the @profile was loaded via HTTP, there is a possible security vulnerability there. I can't think of an attack that could do a serious amount of damage at this point, as the RDFa API does not exist and RDF page data is probably not used to drive logic at this point in time. Just throwing this out there as I do think that we would want to ensure that the browsers that implement RDFa Core "fail to load a profile" when a profile is loaded from an HTTPS page in non-HTTPS mode. It's really implementation guidance, but perhaps something that should be placed into the RDFa API spec or the RDFa Core spec? Thoughts? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Making Payments Frictionless, Saving Journalism http://digitalbazaar.com/2010/09/12/payswarm-api/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:54:17 UTC