[Comment response] To Tom Baker

Dear Tom,

Thank you for your comment 
     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0089.html>
on the RDFa 1.1 drafts. 

The issues you raised are simply our mistake. Ie, there is no hidden agenda in not using http://purl.org/dc/terms/ in the document, simply our own sloppiness...

The internal draft for RDFa1.1 Core uses http://purl.org/dc/terms/ everywhere now, and this will be the case for the published version. 

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-rdfa-wg@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,

Ivan

on behalf of the RDFa Working Group



----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf