- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:12:09 -0600
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I had an action to propose some short names for our specs. Before I do that, a reminder that at the W3C specs are generally organized like this (at least when I have been the editor): short-name / Overview.html - the main spec page (could be the whole spec) short-name-diff.html - diffs from previous version if any short-name-rec.html - diffs from a previous recommendation if any short-name.ps|pdf - postscript / PDF versions of the spec if any short-name.css - any local styles images / - any embedded images (SVG, PNG, etc.) DTD | SCHEMA | RELAX / - any schema implementations js / - any script implementations short-name.zip|tgz - archive of everything that is downloadable As to short names, my suggestions are: RDFa Core 1.1 - rdfa-core XHTML+RDFa 1.1 - xhtml-rdfa RDFa API - rdfa-api RDFa Primer - rdfa-primer (replaces xhtml-rdfa-primer) RDF TripleStore APIs - rdf-triple-api RDFa Usage Cookbook - rdfa-cookbook Finally, in terms of structure on W3C's server in the RDFa area, I propose: 2010/02/rdfa/ drafts/ - place where drafts for public consumption are dropped Overview.html - file that lists the documents in progress and has links to the latest 2010/ - folder for each year ED-short-name-date/ - folder for each published ED sources/ short-name/ - folder for each document in development This completes ACTION-11. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 20:12:44 UTC