- From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:58:31 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
> The next item that I think we should assert is: > > Since it is in scope, and since there is a RDFa WG committed to > continuing work on RDFa, HTML+RDFa should be a deliverable REC of HTML WG. I always assumed that it was an HTML WG deliverable because there wasn't an RDFa WG. Now that there is, wouldn't the RDFa WG take it over as a deliverable?
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 18:59:25 UTC