- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:15:27 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 23/02/2010 10:07, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 23.02.2010 10:57, Martin McEvoy wrote: >> On 22/02/2010 23:08, Ben Adida wrote: >>> On 2/19/10 1:19 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >>>> Julian, Tantek and I will be proposing a @profile everywhere spec >>>> on the >>>> HTML WG in the next month. It would be defined for HTML5, but could be >>>> extended to HTML4.01 and XHTML. >>> >>> Is the idea to simply concatenate @profile with the keywords, or does >>> the profile list a bunch of keywords that can resolve to any URI as >>> defined by the profile? >>> >>> How do we best keep this in sync with the RDFa WG's discussions? >>> >> >> I believe that @profile would be most useful (in RDFa) to define a >> default vocabulary or namespace. >> >> Example >> >> <div profile="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" >> typeof="Person"> >> <span property="name">Ben Adida</span> >> <a rel="homepage" href="http://adida.net/">http://adida.net/</a> >> </div> >> >> It would keep the use of prefixes and the use of xmlns down to a >> minimal. >> I think if RDFa, Microdata and Microformats all adopt the use of >> @profile in this way they would all have a common ground. >> >> Great stuff I think. >> ... Hello Julian, > > I don't think that use is compatible with @profile as defined and > practiced before. For instance, saying > > profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/" > > does not imply *anything* about @rel and @class names inside <body>. Agreed it doesnt. the use of @profile in my example is not intended to be retrieved only used "a globally unique name". Best wishes -- Martin McEvoy WebOrganics http://weborganics.co.uk/ Add to address book: http://transformr.co.uk/hcard/http://weborganics.co.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:16:01 UTC