Re: Possible diagrams for the RDFa Core document

The original figure for literals has now been restored:

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject/rdfa-literals.png

It is not correct for RDF1.1, because the handling of XML Literals has changed a bit...

Ivan

On Dec 7, 2010, at 16:39 , Ivan Herman wrote:

> (related to ISSUE-65)
> 
> Michael referred to the fact that adding some diagrams to section 8 (object resolution) might be a good idea. I have experimented with some, see the attached PDF file. I think the Literal diagram is useful, I am less convinced about the diagrams for @rel and @rev.
> 
> As an aside: the previous RDFa task force had such a diagram for literals, maybe even produced by Michael. However, when the wiki was turned into a set of archived web pages, that diagram got lost:-( I am chasing it via the system team but, there again, starting it from fresh might be helpful on long term...
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Dec/0025.html
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <RDFa Object Resolution.pdf>


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf