- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:05:35 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Go for it. On 12/4/2010 3:31 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Shane, Toby, > > for the good order: > > - Shane, I believe there is an agreement that the current XHTML vocab file is buggy. This is just an editorial issue, not really a LC issue; ie, unless there is an opposition in the group, this should be handled. If you want, I can do it, but I do not want to touch the file without your authorization... > - Toby, I think that the possible addition of the describedby term is a Last Call comment, and should be treated as such; ie, a new issue should be raised and handled by the working group... Could you do that? > > Thanks > > Ivan > > > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:47 , Ivan Herman wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:12 , Toby Inkster wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:02 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> Victor Andrée (cc-d) contacted me a few days ago because he found some >>>> bug in my newest pyRdfa code. However... one issue was not my bug but >>>> yours:-) >>> I volunteered to rewrite the XHTML vocab a few months ago. My rewrite is >>> here: >>> >>> http://buzzword.org.uk/2010/xhtml-vocab-20101110.xhtml >>> >>> It still needs a few changes I think: >>> >>> * We should discuss whether to include "describedby" in the profile >>> mapping to<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>. This >>> relationship is used by POWDER and XRD/WebFinger, so it might be >>> nice to adopt it. We should have a resolution to adopt it or not. >>> >> +1 >> >>> * We should adopt a revision policy for the document. I'd suggest a >>> policy of: new terms are added via W3C Recs. A mailing list is >>> provided for the announcement of new terms. New terms must be >>> announced on that list either three months before they're added >>> to the vocab, or when the spec defining them hits Last Call - >>> whichever comes first! This allows the vocab to change over time, >>> but also gives implementers reasonable security in hard-coding >>> or aggressively caching the vocab. >>> >> It is unclear to me who will 'own' this document. The terms we would add are not (necessarily) for RDFa only, right? >> >> Ivan >> >> >>> * The information above the Introduction section needs revising in >>> that the XHTML2 Working Group is ceasing to exist within the W3C. >>> >>> But once those issues are resolved, it would be nice to publish the >>> updated vocabulary document. >>> >>> -- >>> Toby A Inkster >>> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >>> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >>> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2010 15:06:26 UTC