- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:31:57 +0100
- To: Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-Id: <9D71C361-B19C-44B1-8AA1-3988F0CE2AA9@w3.org>
Shane, Toby, for the good order: - Shane, I believe there is an agreement that the current XHTML vocab file is buggy. This is just an editorial issue, not really a LC issue; ie, unless there is an opposition in the group, this should be handled. If you want, I can do it, but I do not want to touch the file without your authorization... - Toby, I think that the possible addition of the describedby term is a Last Call comment, and should be treated as such; ie, a new issue should be raised and handled by the working group... Could you do that? Thanks Ivan On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:47 , Ivan Herman wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:12 , Toby Inkster wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:02 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> Victor Andrée (cc-d) contacted me a few days ago because he found some >>> bug in my newest pyRdfa code. However... one issue was not my bug but >>> yours:-) >> >> I volunteered to rewrite the XHTML vocab a few months ago. My rewrite is >> here: >> >> http://buzzword.org.uk/2010/xhtml-vocab-20101110.xhtml >> >> It still needs a few changes I think: >> >> * We should discuss whether to include "describedby" in the profile >> mapping to <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>. This >> relationship is used by POWDER and XRD/WebFinger, so it might be >> nice to adopt it. We should have a resolution to adopt it or not. >> > > +1 > >> * We should adopt a revision policy for the document. I'd suggest a >> policy of: new terms are added via W3C Recs. A mailing list is >> provided for the announcement of new terms. New terms must be >> announced on that list either three months before they're added >> to the vocab, or when the spec defining them hits Last Call - >> whichever comes first! This allows the vocab to change over time, >> but also gives implementers reasonable security in hard-coding >> or aggressively caching the vocab. >> > > It is unclear to me who will 'own' this document. The terms we would add are not (necessarily) for RDFa only, right? > > Ivan > > >> * The information above the Introduction section needs revising in >> that the XHTML2 Working Group is ceasing to exist within the W3C. >> >> But once those issues are resolved, it would be nice to publish the >> updated vocabulary document. >> >> -- >> Toby A Inkster >> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2010 09:29:34 UTC