- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:40:22 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:11:37 -0500 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Didn't we address this issue with the following text: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20101026/#s_terms > > """ > Check if the term matches an item in the list of local term mappings. > First compare against the list case-sensitively, and if there is no > match then compare case-insensitively. If there is a match, use the > associated URI. > """ No, that doesn't address the issue. It was that resolution that *caused* the issue. > ... or are you saying that it is indeterminate which term mapping will > be picked? Precisely. Neither "Agent" nor "agent" matches case-sensitively, so case-insensitive matching occurs - and then *both* match. Gregg proposes a solution here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Oct/0272.html That would work, though I fear it may be confusing to explain to document authors. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 20:40:49 UTC