- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:12:40 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:02 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: > Victor Andrée (cc-d) contacted me a few days ago because he found some > bug in my newest pyRdfa code. However... one issue was not my bug but > yours:-) I volunteered to rewrite the XHTML vocab a few months ago. My rewrite is here: http://buzzword.org.uk/2010/xhtml-vocab-20101110.xhtml It still needs a few changes I think: * We should discuss whether to include "describedby" in the profile mapping to <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>. This relationship is used by POWDER and XRD/WebFinger, so it might be nice to adopt it. We should have a resolution to adopt it or not. * We should adopt a revision policy for the document. I'd suggest a policy of: new terms are added via W3C Recs. A mailing list is provided for the announcement of new terms. New terms must be announced on that list either three months before they're added to the vocab, or when the spec defining them hits Last Call - whichever comes first! This allows the vocab to change over time, but also gives implementers reasonable security in hard-coding or aggressively caching the vocab. * The information above the Introduction section needs revising in that the XHTML2 Working Group is ceasing to exist within the W3C. But once those issues are resolved, it would be nice to publish the updated vocabulary document. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 11:13:32 UTC