- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:11:04 -0500
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Toby Inkster <mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
In the RDFa Core spec we use bibo:affirmedBy to associate a subject in the document with an object elsewhere. My mental model for cite was like that. "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: >Toby Inkster, Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:49:58 +0100: >> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:50:41 +0200 >> Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: >> >>> <blockquote id="q1" about="#q1" rel="cite" >>> resource="urn:ISBN:0140449132"/> >> >> This question on semanticoverflow seems relevant: >> >> >http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/1198/how-to-express-a-book-quote-into-rdfahtml-use-cases > >And one of the answers on that page: > > <blockquote about="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2" >cite="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2"> > >Here one could claim that you draw a parallel between @cite and @about >- it is a subject. My thinking has been that if RDFa gets native >support for @cite, then it should treated like @href and @resource. > >However, perhaps it is you who are on the right track here: @cite can >be seen as a semi-embedding of the quoted source. In that way it can >been seen as similar to @src - the @src defines a subject. > >Comment? >-- >leif halvard silli -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 01:11:39 UTC