- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:56:14 +0200
- To: Toby Inkster <mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Toby Inkster, Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:49:58 +0100: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:50:41 +0200 > Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > >> <blockquote id="q1" about="#q1" rel="cite" >> resource="urn:ISBN:0140449132"/> > > This question on semanticoverflow seems relevant: > > http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/1198/how-to-express-a-book-quote-into-rdfahtml-use-cases And one of the answers on that page: <blockquote about="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2" cite="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2"> Here one could claim that you draw a parallel between @cite and @about - it is a subject. My thinking has been that if RDFa gets native support for @cite, then it should treated like @href and @resource. However, perhaps it is you who are on the right track here: @cite can be seen as a semi-embedding of the quoted source. In that way it can been seen as similar to @src - the @src defines a subject. Comment? -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 00:56:52 UTC