I agree with that. We indeed have a history to deal with:-( Ivan On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:48 , Toby Inkster wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:31:12 -0500 > Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > >> But I see Toby's (implied) point that @profile is only legal >> on head in HTML4, so people are used to putting it there. > > Whatsmore, XHTML+RDFa 1.0 said authors SHOULD include: > > <head profile="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab"> > > The idea being that this profile licensed the keywords 'next', 'prev', > etc. (Though RDFa parsers need to still recognise those keywords even > if the profile is absent.) This licence applied not only to the <head> > of the document, but to the <body> too. (And <html rel="next" > resource="foo"> works too!) > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:58:07 UTC