- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:48:15 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:31:12 -0500 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > But I see Toby's (implied) point that @profile is only legal > on head in HTML4, so people are used to putting it there. Whatsmore, XHTML+RDFa 1.0 said authors SHOULD include: <head profile="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab"> The idea being that this profile licensed the keywords 'next', 'prev', etc. (Though RDFa parsers need to still recognise those keywords even if the profile is absent.) This licence applied not only to the <head> of the document, but to the <body> too. (And <html rel="next" resource="foo"> works too!) -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:50:20 UTC