- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:23:10 -0500
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Good work Shane. > > I think we need to clarify how we arrive at the subject of the triples > when @role is used with RDFa, though. > > First, I think we need to explain how "@id gives the subject". I.e., > we need to explain that we take the value of the document's 'base', > append a fragment identifier, and then append @id. (There will no > doubt be an algorithm for that in HTML already.) > Okay - I will make this clear. > And second, if @id is not present, whilst it's true that we need a > fresh bnode, that bnode needs to be distinct from any bnode that > ordinary RDFa processing generates. > > I.e., if an element has a value for @role, as well as one of @typeof, > @rel, or @rev, but has no @about, then we need *two* bnodes to be > generated. > Yes. I agree. That's why the text says 'unique newly created bnode'. Can you suggest wording that would be clearer than that? > Regards, > > Mark > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > >> There is a draft of the Role Attribute spec available at >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/role-attribute - this specification includes ties >> to RDFa Core and describes how triples should be raised when @role is >> encountered in languages that incorporate @role and RDFa Core. Please >> review this document, in particular Appendix A, so that you understand what >> we are trying to do and that you agree with the direction I am taking that >> spec in. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 >> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >> >> >> >> >> -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 02:24:15 UTC