- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:05:35 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
This was legacy text. I have removed it in favor of a cleaner definition of attributes and datatypes. Thanks! Ivan Herman wrote: > There is a remark right before Section 6.6, which says: > > "There is one exception to this; @rel, @rev, @datatype, and @property can also take as a value any term from the list of terms or from the current default vocabulary." > > I am not sure I understand this remark. First of all, @typeof should be listed there, too. But, to my understanding, in this new world, there should be no difference between the behaviour of @about/@resource and the rest, ie, term definitions should also be valid for those. Did I miss some discussions on that? > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:06:09 UTC