Re: Exception on @rel/@rev in RDFa 1.1 Core? (Maybe an editorial issue; Re: Editor's Drafts Updated)

I just realized that there _is_ a difference for @about/@resource due to relative URIs and that they cannot take terms, see your remark on finding a right datatype denomination for that...

So yes, there is an exception, but the formulation was a bit misleading. And typeof should also be in the list for terms...

Cheers

Ivan


On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:18 , Ivan Herman wrote:

> 
> There is a remark right before Section 6.6, which says:
> 
> "There is one exception to this; @rel, @rev, @datatype, and @property can also take as a value any term from the list of terms or from the current default vocabulary."
> 
> I am not sure I understand this remark. First of all, @typeof should be listed there, too. But, to my understanding, in this new world, there should be no difference between the behaviour of @about/@resource and the rest, ie, term definitions should also be valid for those. Did I miss some discussions on that?
> 
> Ivan
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf