- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:24:20 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy, Peter, Thanks for your responses. Docs have been updated. Guus On 18-02-14 11:45, Andy Seaborne wrote: > For Turtle and TriG: > > The reference is used in the context of thr grammar and alignment is to > SPARQL 1.1 so it should be the SPARQL 1.1 version. Direct href links > are to this version. > > > trig/index.html > rdf-turtle/index.html > > Each doc there is one change: > > The [] reference changes and the link text changed to the current title > "SPARQL 1.1 Query Language". > > I haven't touched the REC drafts - I can do if you want me to. > > The REC drafts have autogenerated HTML for the references. > > Should the docs be regenenerated (how?) or change the HTML in place? > > Andy > > On 18/02/14 01:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> In some sense, the pointer to the old version is right, as that is >> where datasets came from. However, there is no problem with pointing to >> the new version, and it is probably better to do so. >> >> peter >> >> On 02/17/2014 02:20 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >>> Peter, Pat, Eric, Gavin, Andy, >>> >>> Semantics, Turtle and TriG all have a reference to the SPARQL Query >>> document of 2008: >>> >>> [RDF-SPARQL-QUERY] >>> Eric Prud'hommeaux; Andy Seaborne. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. >>> 15 January >>> 2008. W3C Recommendation. URL: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ >>> >>> Shouldn't this be updated to refer to the 2013 version >>> [[sparql11-query]]? >>> >>> Guus >>> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 12:24:49 UTC