- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:53 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
For Turtle and TriG: The reference is used in the context of thr grammar and alignment is to SPARQL 1.1 so it should be the SPARQL 1.1 version. Direct href links are to this version. trig/index.html rdf-turtle/index.html Each doc there is one change: The [] reference changes and the link text changed to the current title "SPARQL 1.1 Query Language". I haven't touched the REC drafts - I can do if you want me to. The REC drafts have autogenerated HTML for the references. Should the docs be regenenerated (how?) or change the HTML in place? Andy On 18/02/14 01:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > In some sense, the pointer to the old version is right, as that is > where datasets came from. However, there is no problem with pointing to > the new version, and it is probably better to do so. > > peter > > On 02/17/2014 02:20 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> Peter, Pat, Eric, Gavin, Andy, >> >> Semantics, Turtle and TriG all have a reference to the SPARQL Query >> document of 2008: >> >> [RDF-SPARQL-QUERY] >> Eric Prud'hommeaux; Andy Seaborne. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. >> 15 January >> 2008. W3C Recommendation. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ >> >> Shouldn't this be updated to refer to the 2013 version >> [[sparql11-query]]? >> >> Guus >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 10:46:23 UTC