W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Changes to test/implementation report URIs

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:23:44 +0100
Message-ID: <52FD1BC0.8060509@vu.nl>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'Gregg Kellogg' <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
CC: 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, 'Sandro Hawke' <sandro@w3.org>

On 13-02-14 20:11, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:31 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>> On 12-02-14 21:52, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>>> I've updated documents in mercurial to set URIs appropriate for each
>>>> spec:
>>>> For RDF-MD, I changed
>>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/tests/> to
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/>, and
>>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/reports/> to
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/>.
> [...]
>>>> Also, Guus removed the test-suite location from the header of each
>>>> spec, and replaced the implementation report with a reference to the
>>>> rdf11-testcases doc. If anything, I think I would change that to be
>>>> the generic test-suite location, and either restore the
>>>> implementation report to the actual implementation report location
>>>> for that spec, or just leave it out.
>>> OK, fine with that. So, these will be the locations I'll put in the
>> files:
>>> Concepts:
>>>   Needs to have an impl report; suggest we link to the Testcases Note
>>> Semantics
>>>   test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/
>>>   impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/index.html
> [...]
>> +1 Works for me.
> Sorry, but wasn't the whole reason to create the RDF11-TESTCASES document to
> have everything in one place? So, why don't we just link from each document

That was indeed my preference, but I can also live with Gregg's 
proposal.  I suggest you two reach a consensus.  Either way is fine for me.

> Also, referencing an "Implementation report" from the header of Concepts
> looks very weird to me given that Concepts isn't implementable. IMO it
> should be removed.

Pubrules requires a link to an implementation report. The Test Cases 
document is exactly the right link for Concepts, I think. See the 
explicit remark:

   RDF 1.1 Concepts [RDF11-CONCEPTS] does not have a test suite and is 
not directly implemented in software; instead, it is implemented by the 
specs which build on it, including the other specs in this set.

If you want to make this even clearer, you could move this to the first 
item of the list.


> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 19:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC