- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:02:11 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 12-02-14 22:12, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > The document is updated, and I saved a draft to <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/drafts/rdf11-testcases/Overview.html>. > > The PubRules checker finds issues, but it seems reasonable to me: > > * Markup saved as HTML5, which I believe is okay, but this generates an error. > * Want's style sheet be be W3C-WD, but it's W3C-NOTE. > * Want's status to have W3C Working Draft, but has W3C Note. > * No Previous Version link. > * ... > > There are more. I'm not sure that notes need to pass pubrules; let me know if there's something that needs to be done for this to pass cleanly. Notes do need to pass pubrules. I edited the ReSpec attributes a bit and removed the "Prtevious version" link manually from the static version [1], and now it passes pubrules (well, there is a HTML error). The inclusion of a "Previous version" looks like a ReSpec bug. I'll let them know. Guus [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/REC-drafts/NOTE-rdf11-testcases-20140225/Overview.html > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > >
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 10:02:38 UTC