- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:31:31 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On 12-02-14 21:52, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > I've updated documents in mercurial to set URIs appropriate for each > spec: > > For RDF-MD, I changed > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/tests/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/>, and > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/reports/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/>. > > For N-Triples, I changed > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-nt/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesTests/>, and > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports-nt/> > to <http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesReports/>. > > For Turltle, I changed > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleReports/>. > > For TriG, I changed > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/tests/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/>, and > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports-nt/> > to <http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesReports/>. I assume the last two lines are a C+P error and should have read: <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/reports/> to <http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGReports/>. > For N-Quads, I changed > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/nquads/tests/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsTests/>, and > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/nquads/reports/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsReports/>. > > For RDF/XML, a previous updated used > <http://www.w3.org/2013/RDFXMLTests/>, which I changed back to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/RDFXMLTests/>. I also updated the spec's test > references to point to this version, rather than the 2000 versions > changing <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/> to > <http://www.w3.org/2013/RDFXMLTests/>. I also updated the Overview, > but not the diff, as it doesn't seem that ReSpec will generate it > automatically. > > Note that the implementation reports are in raw ReSpec format; they > could be frozen and put in place in the final location, but the > mercurial version should probably be in ReSpec format; I don't really > have an opinion either way. > > I created TESTS.zip and TESTS.tar.gz files for each test suite. I > presume that the index file for the tests in the final location is > generated from the README, but you may have to do something for that. > At this point, you should be able to copy the test and reports > directories to their respective locations. > > Also, Guus removed the test-suite location from the header of each > spec, and replaced the implementation report with a reference to the > rdf11-testcases doc. If anything, I think I would change that to be > the generic test-suite location, and either restore the > implementation report to the actual implementation report location > for that spec, or just leave it out. OK, fine with that. So, these will be the locations I'll put in the files: Concepts: Needs to have an impl report; suggest we link to the Testcases Note Semantics test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/ impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/index.html Turtle test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/ impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleReports/index.html TriG test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGTests/ impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGReports/index.html N-Triples test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesTests/ impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesReports/index.html N-Quads test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsTests/ impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsReports/index.html RDF/XML test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/RDFXMLTests/ Guus > > Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net >
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 09:32:02 UTC