- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:15:27 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 02:16:00 UTC
+1. This is a useful change, Gus. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > On Nov 27, 2013, at 17:15, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > > I'm doing the final changes on the RDF Schema draft. I wanted to run one thing first by the WG, namely the one-sentence abstract of what RDF Schema is. > > One option is to take the characterization given in the Semantics document: > > RDF Schema extends RDF to a larger vocabulary with more > complex semantic constraints. > > However, I think using the term "vocabulary" in this way will confuse people with a data-modelling background. Taking a data-modelling perspective RDF Schema should probably be seen as a Enhanced Entity Relationship data-modelling language [1]. I therefore propose the following abstract: > > RDF Schema provides a data-modelling vocabulary for RDF data. > > Feedback appreciated. > > Guus > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_entity%E2%80%93relationship_model > >
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 02:16:00 UTC