Re: implementation reports

Looks good.

Pat

On Nov 1, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> On 11/01/2013 02:28 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>> On 11/01/2013 01:09 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> Is there any problem with me sending out a personal heads-up to various groupa a bit in advance so that the process can start a bit early, or at least we can get an idea of who might participate?   
>>> 
>> 
>> Please don't point them to that /TR URL, but if you point them to the editor's draft, it's fine.
>> 
>> OK.
>>  
>> 
>> Looking more, I see respec has a field implementationReportURI.   
>> 
>> Also, I wonder about including your what's-changed text in either the SOTD, or on a wiki page we link to from the SOTD.   I'm inclined to go with the wiki version so we can update it.      In either case, I guess use respec's 'sotd' field to add it.
>> 
>> Wiki is better, I think, as there may be missing bits, and we might like to update it independently of any official document.    
> 
> Okay, I linked to http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Entailment_Changes
> 
> Please update it by Tuesday.
> 
> Also, please make sure I didn't mess up anything with http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-rdf11-mt-20131105/ 
> 
>       --- Sandro
> 
>> 
>>         - s
>> 
>> 
>> peter
>>  
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Saturday, 2 November 2013 05:44:54 UTC