W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

RE: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:24:48 +0200
To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00a101ce7afc$360ad570$a2208050$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:50 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> We can be conservative or liberal about what can go the the graph name
> position:
>
> [...]
>
> I prefer the latter as it encourages the good practice of making
> assertions about labeled graphs, e.g.
> [[
>   [ :utteredBy "Bob" ] { <moon> <madeOf> <greenCheese> }
> ]]

Me too but under the current semantics those wouldn't be assertions about
the labeled graph as the graph name doesn't denote the graph. I still find
that very problematic.



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Sunday, 7 July 2013 10:25:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC