- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 15:19:19 +0200
- To: markus.lanthaler@gmx.net
- CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
This is ISSUE-93, raised in August 2012 and closed soon after. The decision was "we do not give a name to this subset". ISSUE-93: Give a name to "literals that are not language-tagged strings" http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/93 Richard's arguments to close the issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Aug/0172.html Pat, however, made a proposal: "tagless literals". http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Aug/0181.html AZ. Le 04/07/2013 12:43, Markus Lanthaler a écrit : > RDF Concepts currently only defines the subset of literals that are > language-tagged strings. There's no name for literals that are not > language-tagged strings. In JSON-LD we use "typed value" for that class of > literals. I would like to propose to add such a definition to RDF Concepts. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 13:19:55 UTC