- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:52:42 +0200
- To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 1:38 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > All literals are typed now, True, even though only rdf:langString-typed literals can have a language tag which means that either that type is redundant or language-tagging is overly restricted... but that's a different story. We should thus also replace "datatyped literals" with "literals" in the abstract. > so typed value isn't a very good name for > literals that are not language-tagged strings. Yeah, there might be better names. Suggestions? > On 07/04/2013 03:43 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > RDF Concepts currently only defines the subset of literals that are > > language-tagged strings. There's no name for literals that are not > > language-tagged strings. In JSON-LD we use "typed value" for that > class of > > literals. I would like to propose to add such a definition to RDF > Concepts. > > > > > > -- > > Markus Lanthaler > > @markuslanthaler > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 11:53:15 UTC