Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2013-07-04 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 04:38:23 -0700
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51D55EAF.5060809@gmail.com>

All literals are typed now, so typed value isn't a very good name for literals 
that are not language-tagged strings.

peter

On 07/04/2013 03:43 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> RDF Concepts currently only defines the subset of literals that are
> language-tagged strings. There's no name for literals that are not
> language-tagged strings. In JSON-LD we use "typed value" for that class of
> literals. I would like to propose to add such a definition to RDF Concepts.
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 11:38:58 UTC