- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:43:46 -0700
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
See http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_documents for the process. That document is a bit inscrutable in one spot. Respec has a special process that is triggered by cntrl-alt-shift-S which produces a non-respec version of the document that you can then copy and paste into a text editor and then put into the drafts area. Warning: this triggering is somewhat fragile, it happened for me only about 1/4 of the time I tried the incantation. peter On 07/03/2013 07:35 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > Several of you have offered to help get Concepts ready with respect to Pubrules. Thanks. It looks like I'll need it. > > Can someone please tell me how to get the Pubrules checker to understand that ReSpec has actually provided most of what it is complaining about? Do I need to export the doc somehow? > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 09:44:22 UTC