W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

RE: Comments on rdf11-json

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 12:48:26 +0200
To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <013001ce77da$daa5adf0$8ff109d0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:32 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 03/07/13 00:21, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> > Meta-remark:
> >
> > It would be nice if, instead of proposing an alterative format to
> > JSON-LD we could propose a controlled subset of JSON-LD that meets
> the
> > requirements that this format addresses.
> 
> That would defeat the purpose of recording an existing format.
> 
> http://docs.api.talis.com/platform-api/output-types/rdf-json

Just a thought. Would it be a viable alternative if Ian (or someone else
from Talis) would submit this as an *informational* RFC? The required
process and effort is minimal and we would avoid a lot of potential
confusion by publishing two JSON serializations in the RDF WG.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:48:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC