- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:31:57 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 03/07/13 00:21, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > Meta-remark: > > It would be nice if, instead of proposing an alterative format to > JSON-LD we could propose a controlled subset of JSON-LD that meets the > requirements that this format addresses. That would defeat the purpose of recording an existing format. http://docs.api.talis.com/platform-api/output-types/rdf-json Andy
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 09:32:31 UTC