Re: status of rdf:langString

Le 26/02/2013 21:08, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
> Is rdf:langString a datatype?  It sure looks as if it should be, but it
> isn't.

It is.

>
> The OWL WG finessed this issue a different way, that was consistent with
> datatypes.  This could be done here as well (the datatype rdf:langString
> takes strings of the form "xxx@ll", ...), but maybe my proposed fix for
> the Semantics could be made visible in Concepts.

We have debated this extensively and we reach an agreement. What you 
propose was proposed then, was rejected then (personally, I was in 
favour of it).

AZ

>
> peter
>


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:07:28 UTC