Re: Additions to Agenda tomorrow

On Feb 19, 2013, at 15:45, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> 
>> This is a request to add the following items to the RDF WG telecon
>> Agenda tomorrow:
>> 
>> 1. Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Allow a graph name to
>>  be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).
>> 2. Preference-poll: Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names,
>>  denote graphs?
>> 3. Preference-poll: Do IRIs, when used as graph names, denote graphs?
>> 
>> Here are the corresponding proposals:
>> 
>> PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically,
>> allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.
>> 
>> PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph
>> that they are paired with.
>> 
>> PREFERENCE POLL: IRIs, when used as graph names, denote the graph that
>> they are paired with.
> 
> I believe that the WG has already decided this last one. IRIs, used as graph names, are *not* required to denote the graph that they are paired with. 
> 
> However, AFAIKS, none of the arguments for taking that position apply to the previous blank node case.

Agreed.  I'll add the first two.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood


> 
> Pat
> 
>> 
>> -- manu
>> 
>> -- 
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
>> http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>