- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:32 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > This is a request to add the following items to the RDF WG telecon > Agenda tomorrow: > > 1. Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Allow a graph name to > be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph). > 2. Preference-poll: Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names, > denote graphs? > 3. Preference-poll: Do IRIs, when used as graph names, denote graphs? > > Here are the corresponding proposals: > > PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically, > allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs. > > PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph > that they are paired with. > > PREFERENCE POLL: IRIs, when used as graph names, denote the graph that > they are paired with. I believe that the WG has already decided this last one. IRIs, used as graph names, are *not* required to denote the graph that they are paired with. However, AFAIKS, none of the arguments for taking that position apply to the previous blank node case. Pat > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 20:46:07 UTC