- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:20:03 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-02-17, at 16:34, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > > On 17/02/13 13:15, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >> >> On 16 Feb 2013, at 21:19, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > >>> I suspect that it's your preference for a stronger referencing >>> semantics which prejudices you against bnodes as graph labels. >> >> I do not think so. I actually do not have a strong opinion on the >> bnodes-as-graph-labels issue. What I am uneasy about is that, *if we >> use them*, they would represent a different semantics as IRI-s which >> is my understanding of Pat's emails. That is all. > > +1 +1 Furthermore, the community has some experience of bNodes-as-graph-labels, but they were abandoned in at least one system, and aren't popular now - I don't think I've seen one in the last decade, though some may exist. This should tell us something. - Steve PS As a community, we're not good at learning from our mistakes. -- Steve Harris Experian +44 20 3042 4132 Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 11:20:36 UTC