- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:29:28 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
As there were no objections to publishing the Datasets draft and we also came to consensus on the multiple-graph example, we will publish tomorrow three Notes: What's new in RDF 1.1 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-new/index.html RDF 1.1 Primer https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-primer/index.html RDF 1.1: On Semantics of Datasets https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-dataset/index.html Guus On 13-12-13 11:29, Guus Schreiber wrote: > The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first > public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within the > next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the publication > moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for FPWD > you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a comment > you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note. > > Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets". > > Guus > > On 12-12-13 22:08, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: >> The new draft addresses most of Pat's comments. I added 2 issues to it. >> I also added a section that reflects Sandro's box dataset semantics, >> following Guus' suggestion, and also made some changes in response to >> Peter initial comments. >> >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-dataset/index.html >> >> >> If it looks ok, we can vote by email to make it a FPWD. Sorry for not >> having done this before yesterday teleconf.
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 09:29:58 UTC