W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Title of rdf11-datasets [Was: Re: PROPOSED to publish: New editor's draft of RDF Datatset Semantics]

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:52:09 -0500
Message-ID: <52ACC4F9.80200@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 12/14/13 1:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> Or we could go all Lucretius and call it
>
> RDF 1.1: On the Nature of Datasets.
+1

"Notion" might also work too :-)

Kingsley
>
> Pat
>
> On Dec 14, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote:
>
>> Le 14/12/2013 14:02, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>>>
>>> On 13-12-13 16:59, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>>> I would like to have RDF 1.1 at the beginning, like the other documents,
>>>> I'd like that "RDF Datasets" stays like this, and we can put something
>>>> like "Discussion" in it, to show it's not only providing just one
>>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>> "RDF 1.1: A Discussion of the Semantics of RDF Datasets"
>>> Descriptive but a bit long. What about:
>>>
>>>    RDF 1.1: On Semanitcs of RDF Datasets
>> Yes, I like it.
>>
>>
>> AZ
>>
>>
>>> Guus
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> AZ.
>>>>
>>>> Le 13/12/2013 13:34, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
>>>>> On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:05 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>>>>> Le 13/12/2013 11:29, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>>>>>>> The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first
>>>>>>> public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the
>>>>>> publication
>>>>>>> moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for
>>>>>> FPWD
>>>>>>> you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a
>>>>>> comment
>>>>>>> you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note.
>>>>>> +1
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets".
>>>>>> And maybe the title to "RDF 1.1 Datasets Semantics" (although "RDF
>>>>>> Dataset" is the concept to which the semantics is applied).
>>>>> Could we add "Discussion" or "Potential" or something similar to
>>>>> indicate
>>>>> that this document doesn't define the one and only dataset semantics but
>>>>> discusses multiple options. So, something like "Discussion of RDF 1.1
>>>>> Dataset Semantics".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Markus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Markus Lanthaler
>>>>> @markuslanthaler
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Antoine Zimmermann
>> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
>> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>> 158 cours Fauriel
>> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>> France
>> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
>> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
>> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen






Received on Saturday, 14 December 2013 20:52:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC