W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Title of rdf11-datasets [Was: Re: PROPOSED to publish: New editor's draft of RDF Datatset Semantics]

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:56:26 -0800
Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CC951AC7-7DCF-4801-B93D-F304064C9975@ihmc.us>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Or we could go all Lucretius and call it 

RDF 1.1: On the Nature of Datasets. 

Pat

On Dec 14, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote:

> Le 14/12/2013 14:02, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> On 13-12-13 16:59, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>> I would like to have RDF 1.1 at the beginning, like the other documents,
>>> I'd like that "RDF Datasets" stays like this, and we can put something
>>> like "Discussion" in it, to show it's not only providing just one
>>> solution.
>>> 
>>> "RDF 1.1: A Discussion of the Semantics of RDF Datasets"
>> 
>> Descriptive but a bit long. What about:
>> 
>>   RDF 1.1: On Semanitcs of RDF Datasets
> 
> Yes, I like it.
> 
> 
> AZ
> 
> 
>> 
>> Guus
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> AZ.
>>> 
>>> Le 13/12/2013 13:34, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
>>>> On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:05 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>>>> Le 13/12/2013 11:29, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>>>>>> The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first
>>>>>> public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within
>>>>> the
>>>>>> next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the
>>>>> publication
>>>>>> moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for
>>>>> FPWD
>>>>>> you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a
>>>>> comment
>>>>>> you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note.
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>>>> Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets".
>>>>> 
>>>>> And maybe the title to "RDF 1.1 Datasets Semantics" (although "RDF
>>>>> Dataset" is the concept to which the semantics is applied).
>>>> 
>>>> Could we add "Discussion" or "Potential" or something similar to
>>>> indicate
>>>> that this document doesn't define the one and only dataset semantics but
>>>> discusses multiple options. So, something like "Discussion of RDF 1.1
>>>> Dataset Semantics".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Markus
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Markus Lanthaler
>>>> @markuslanthaler
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Antoine Zimmermann
> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
> 158 cours Fauriel
> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
> France
> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Saturday, 14 December 2013 18:56:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC