W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Title of rdf11-datasets [Was: Re: PROPOSED to publish: New editor's draft of RDF Datatset Semantics]

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:02:33 +0100
Message-ID: <52AC56E9.7080104@vu.nl>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 13-12-13 16:59, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> I would like to have RDF 1.1 at the beginning, like the other documents,
> I'd like that "RDF Datasets" stays like this, and we can put something
> like "Discussion" in it, to show it's not only providing just one solution.
>
> "RDF 1.1: A Discussion of the Semantics of RDF Datasets"

Descriptive but a bit long. What about:

   RDF 1.1: On Semanitcs of RDF Datasets

Guus


>
>
> AZ.
>
> Le 13/12/2013 13:34, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
>> On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:05 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Le 13/12/2013 11:29, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>>>> The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first
>>>> public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within
>>> the
>>>> next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the
>>> publication
>>>> moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for
>>> FPWD
>>>> you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a
>>> comment
>>>> you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +1
>>
>>>> Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets".
>>>
>>> And maybe the title to "RDF 1.1 Datasets Semantics" (although "RDF
>>> Dataset" is the concept to which the semantics is applied).
>>
>> Could we add "Discussion" or "Potential" or something similar to indicate
>> that this document doesn't define the one and only dataset semantics but
>> discusses multiple options. So, something like "Discussion of RDF 1.1
>> Dataset Semantics".
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Markus
>>
>>
>> --
>> Markus Lanthaler
>> @markuslanthaler
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 14 December 2013 13:03:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC