Re: Multigraphs example proposal in RDF 1.1 Primer

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> After chatting with Guus, here are the options we'd like to propose for
> the multi-graphs example in the primer.
>
> 1) After the TriG listing, adding something like "RDF 1.1 doesn't
> prescribe any specific semantics for datasets. Possible semantics are
> described in [DATASET-SEMANTICS]. In this example dataset we assume
> graph names represent the source of the RDF data held within the
> corresponding graphs, i.e. by retrieving <http://example.org/bob> we
> would get access to the four triples in that graph. In the default graph
> we associate provenance information with the <http://example.org/bob>
> graph."
>

+1, exact wording to be left up to the authors. This most closely aligns
with our responses to JJCs formal objection, and other responses to
comments.

Cheers,
Gavin