W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Multigraphs example proposal in RDF 1.1 Primer

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:22:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPqY83wCB2cK1Lz7URE1zKC5uvkiZ990jPwhWC+eyje4eU5HDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> After chatting with Guus, here are the options we'd like to propose for
> the multi-graphs example in the primer.
>
> 1) After the TriG listing, adding something like "RDF 1.1 doesn't
> prescribe any specific semantics for datasets. Possible semantics are
> described in [DATASET-SEMANTICS]. In this example dataset we assume
> graph names represent the source of the RDF data held within the
> corresponding graphs, i.e. by retrieving <http://example.org/bob> we
> would get access to the four triples in that graph. In the default graph
> we associate provenance information with the <http://example.org/bob>
> graph."
>

+1, exact wording to be left up to the authors. This most closely aligns
with our responses to JJCs formal objection, and other responses to
comments.

Cheers,
Gavin
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 19:22:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC