- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:59:52 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hello, After chatting with Guus, here are the options we'd like to propose for the multi-graphs example in the primer. 1) After the TriG listing, adding something like "RDF 1.1 doesn't prescribe any specific semantics for datasets. Possible semantics are described in [DATASET-SEMANTICS]. In this example dataset we assume graph names represent the source of the RDF data held within the corresponding graphs, i.e. by retrieving <http://example.org/bob> we would get access to the four triples in that graph. In the default graph we associate provenance information with the <http://example.org/bob> graph." 2) Adding a statement to the example: <http://example.org/bob> a eg:WebSource . (or sd:NamedGraph? or something else?) and explaining that eg:WebSource (or else) identify graph names that can be accessed through HTTP to retrieve the corresponding graph content. 3) Adding a statement to the example similar as in section 4 of [DATASET-SEMANTICS], on the dataset itself, to express its semantics, e.g. <> a sd:Dataset ; eg:semantics <rdf-dataset#3.3> ? To me, it seems like option 1 is probably the simplest to implement (no need to change the example, just adding a bit of text). Option 2 and 3 are OK as well, but we'd need help with them - e.g. what vocabulary should we use? Also, if option 2 doesn't work, we (and Markus apparently, from his earlier email) would like to understand why. Best, Yves ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 17:00:25 UTC