W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27)

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:09:52 +0100
Message-ID: <52AB2340.5030406@vu.nl>
To: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 13-12-13 15:47, Thomas Baker wrote:
> ISSUE-27 [1] was resolved in April 2011 as follows:
>
>      Resolution at Amsterdam FTF: Close ISSUE-27, not marking rdf:value as
>      archaic, but with the understand that the modeling advice in RDF Primer
>      will be revisited.
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-04-14#resolution_3
>
> Inasmuch as discussion of rdf:value takes up almost two pages [2] in the
> current primer [3], the new primer should perhaps at least acknowledge
> rdf:value and provide a sentence or two of follow-up explanation.
>
> Alternatively, if space in the Primer is at a premium, perhaps a mention could
> be squeezed into rdf-new (which should perhaps be referenced from the Primer).

As we resolved to remove refs to the old Primer I copied the the 
rdf:value example into the relevant section of RDF Schema [1]. Would 
that suffice?

Guus

[1] 
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-schema/index.html#ch_value

>
> Tom
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/27
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/
>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 15:10:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:18 UTC