W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27)

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:47:56 -0500
To: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20131213144756.GA49452@julius.local>
ISSUE-27 [1] was resolved in April 2011 as follows:

    Resolution at Amsterdam FTF: Close ISSUE-27, not marking rdf:value as
    archaic, but with the understand that the modeling advice in RDF Primer
    will be revisited.
    http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-04-14#resolution_3

Inasmuch as discussion of rdf:value takes up almost two pages [2] in the
current primer [3], the new primer should perhaps at least acknowledge
rdf:value and provide a sentence or two of follow-up explanation.

Alternatively, if space in the Primer is at a premium, perhaps a mention could
be squeezed into rdf-new (which should perhaps be referenced from the Primer).

Tom

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/27
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 14:48:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:18 UTC