- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:46:26 +0100
- To: "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:53 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > > Not sure I follow. Do you want to change that sentence to > > > > "In summary: RDF literals are either language-tagged strings, > > or literals" > > > > That doesn't make much sense to me. > > Its better if you quote it in full, but let me try again. HOw about > this: > > In summary: with one exception, RDF literals combine a string and an > IRI <a>identify</a>ing a datatype. The exception is language-tagged > strings, which have two syntactic components, a string and a language > tag, and are assigned the type <code>rdf:langString</code>. > > Does that read better? Yeah... I can live with that even though the "two syntactic components" irritates me (I know what you mean but it sounds more complicated than it needs to be)... I don't want to bikeshed such an unimportant sentence. So, just use the sentence above or simply drop it :-) -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 17:47:02 UTC